The article on Pirro, who offered to readers today, is a translation that aims to present the public a sense of his forgotten. Qualities and military role that it has military and political history. Caught hard and so absurd after qëmtimit his home, or even trying to return a wealth of global property nationalist debate, pyrrhic little known figure of what the modern world estimates. Author Nicola Zotti is in military occupation, but also show many historical culture, but also its stilistikën writing. Noticeable that in all trajtesën his summary, he uses the term Pirro, avoiding ndajshtesën of Epirit. This is because history is just a man with this name and that of world history, especially military admits it to recognize the merits of a politician and ushtaraku such disdain by refusing to discuss the pseudo-scientific debate on ethnic origin, which has no essential role. To explain this, not just writing in word, but all literature recognizes Pirro as a representatives of the three largest art military helenistik, Philip of Macedonia and supports Hanibalit. For more author atribuon he credited the military planning support diplomacy as an instrument equal. Thus, a strategist who seeks the war in the context of a project and that the investigation provides diplomatic metodikën peace. A man who started with the model of Alexander the Great and career closed with a product, which brought inspirimin the mythical hero of the study table in genuine military, while leaving behind us a project and a vision that was realized, as is known, only from Rome.
When the Balkans aimed Mediterranean empire. Dealing between Helene and Roman world. Pirro’s Epirit, strategu the first in modern history. Planner and visionary, Pirro was a hero rather than a statesman, who reformed the military art
Pirro (318 p.k-272 p.k). Plutarku, Polibi, Dionizi of Halikarnasit, Pauzania and Justini; all sources that have arrived so far to figure pyrrhic combine to pass information to and consult admirimin tough for his ambitions. Likewise, the general idea that De goal back a man who has greater ambition than talent show to be a criminal. Certainly this can not be said for Pirro; his great ambition was fueled by human quality, so great. Helena sovereign must be ambitious; weighed on the shadow of Alexander the Great and his acquisition as a model was an unavoidable necessity. I shkëlqyeri and mprehti Plutark, observes that, however, Pirro imitonte not Alexander the Great in external appearance, but in its essence. Some of the descendants of the Macedonians, were tending to mimicking the action, such as bias of the head in one hand, as Alexander, even though they did not receive injuries that force the hero to take such a view not natural. Pirro, meanwhile, urged him to imitonte achievement and military conquest and probably follow that this effort with personal courage. In more than one occasion, he decided the fate of the battle, while they personally intervened this dealing was crucial. But Pirro had, even though it was easy to have a character better than Alexander the Great; was less disponuar for confrontation and eksese and nothing shfaqej as half divine. Pirro stood much closer to our modern understanding. More so than a leading state hero. He was able to express and formulate strategies geopolitical as well as qualitative complex, a project designed to be must bring Pirro domination in the Mediterranean. They proved able to rationalize its military doctrine in a work that has been lost, but in antiquity brought the consolidation of his reputation beyond his military successes. His yard became a center of advanced strategic studies “whether to use a term of our days. Thus, in addition to his important works were written by CINET Thesaljoti, The pyrrhic and Alexander, his son. He directed his attention towards the Western Mediterranean. Dominonte Kartagjena in this area, but, except for her, there lulëzonin also numerous colonies of Helene as rich as can be supported by its forces fighting her, but also to a local power getting rapid increase that was Rome . Step, provided the Pirro zbarkonte in Italy to help Tarentin (Taranto today) against Rome. Colony would finance the war, as sanite tribes, including those threatened by the Roman ekspansionizmi, would serve as additional troops for the army epirotase. With faded Roman aggressiveness, Pirro would benefit from the lack of stability sicilian endemic to the island gëlltitur, a step needed to develop this crucial confrontation, with the Kartagjenën. And after its remains world. To not create the idea that this was a project megaloman, ekzagjerimit fruit of the military mentality one of many konkusitatorëve history, adding that Pirro should have a strategic vision of complete and sophisticated diplomacy in which the objectives will be clear had a role almost equal to the fight. Diplomacy is not seen as a useful tool, a hall and dinakërish fraud in military service requirements, but the primary instrument available to its projects. How all this went, all they know: the Romans were testified as a bone too hard to be broken, even by Pirro. Such would be the Romans, even many years later for imituesin his best, in the context of school leaders helenistikë, Hanibalin, who elaborated his huazoi and busting strategy and disposal of Rome, through its isolation from italikë allies. Exclusion of exceptional and unique is that Rome, however, should be understood, and this ability to understand the fault as well as for Pirro to Hanibalin. Both were confident on the basis of its capacity and tactical, which were very large, but, however, does not suffice to establish supremacy and hegemony over the “Rome System. A system based on internal political consensus and the strong diplomatic relations with the outside, cream on a homogeneous solid and morally, on an army of citizens, whose number was so skilled as to afford the mercenary helenistikë. Pyrrhic victory against Rome, in fact is even more based on political background than what was achieved against Hanibalit. Pirro estimated the opponent does not. He believes his elephants and his apparatus very kolauduar and related military downplayed the ability of resistance to a social and civil system, which was so different from that helenistik, apparently as indestructible as to waterproof.
Here’s what shows in what Plutarku CINET Thesaljoti Ambassador pyrrhic, made in Rome:
“… Received the analysis and consideration, by observing the manner of the Romans living. He tried to understand what were the virtues and qualities of their form of government, by talking to the most righteous of Romans. All these showed his pyrrhic, in particular, showed how the Senate had seemed to him as a consensus among many kings. Regarding the people, feared that the result of a hydra Lernës (mythological monster that shumëfishoheshin heads who was killed by Herakliu), as consul had already collected a number two times greater than those available in the battle Previous (in Heraklea) and so were willing to hold weapons. ” Diplomacy was invented and Cineas goals were excellent, but between Rome and culture helenistike distance was still too large.
Will be victorious, more precisely the Romans, who would think to fill this space: the invasion of Tarentit, which constituted and its first expansion, will arrive in Rome Liv Androniku, which emanate Latin literature.